Welfare and Immigration
Waive of the Future? Federalism and the Next Phase of Welfare Reform. Determining the appropriate balance of power between the national government and the states is the "cardinal question of our constitutional system," wrote Woodrow Wilson in 1908. The question, he said, would resurface at "every successive stage of our political and economic development." A current manifestation of the time-honored debate focuses on whether to grant state governments additional discretion in managing and integrating a wide range of federally supported services that, in principle, can help the nation's poor earn a living rather than depend on public assistance. This March 2004 Policy Brief from the Brookings Institution examines this issue.
Connecting the Dots: Can the United States Integrate Welfare Reform and Workforce Development?. This brief produced by the Hudson Institute discusses how the U.S. is grappling with the challenge of what to do when education and technology are not enough to keep a worker employed. The article proposes that an integrated workforce system, in the long run, eases the economic burden on states. Moreover, the integration of welfare and workforce systems holds the potential of creating a new generation of better-trained workers—all critical to the growth and opportunity in the emerging global economy and global workforce.
Recent Trends in Food Stamp Participation: Have New Policies Made a Difference?. This report was produced through the “Assessing the New Federalism” project, an Urban Institute Program that accesses changing social policies. Food stamp caseloads increased dramatically between October 2000 and October 2003. This study examines whether new program rules and procedures increased participation rates for families with children. The results show that families recently on welfare were substantially more likely to participate in the Food Stamp program in 2002 than in 1997 or 1999. In contrast, participation rates for families with no cash welfare experience, the largest share of poor families with children, remained quite low throughout the period.
What Do ‘I Do’s’ Do? Potential Benefits of Marriage for Cohabitating Couples with Children. This report, published by The Urban Institute, uses data from the 2002 National Survey of America's Families to show that over 70 percent of the difference in poverty, low-income status, and food insecurity between children living with married and cohabiting couples can be attributed to differences in work status, education, age, and race/ethnicity of these couples. The remaining difference can be attributed to unmeasured family characteristics and the intrinsic benefits of marriage.
America's Newest Working Families: Cost, Crowding and Conditions for Immigrants. Over the last several years, the Center for Housing Policy has released a series of reports documenting the critical housing needs of America's low- to moderate-income working families. While previous research on working families examined variations across different income and minority groups, it did not specifically identify workers who were first generation Americans. This report attempts to fill this gap by examining the incidence and nature of critical housing needs among recent immigrants.
All Under One Roof: Mixed-Status Families in an Era of Reform. The United States' immigration policy is an issue at constant debate, particularly when it comes to the benefits illegal immigrants and their citizen children are entitled to receive. The passage of welfare reform in 1996 transformed immigrant policy by instituting unprecedented tough measures toward new and current immigrants. One policy, however, has remained unchanged: granting children born to immigrants on U.S. soil with full citizenship. The combination of new exclusionary policies toward immigrants and the unchanging status of U.S.-born children produces problems for these "mixed status" families, which account for nearly nine percent of all U.S. families with children. Since the law now draws sharp distinctions between citizens and non-citizens, members of the same family are treated quite differently by service providers. Read more about how this distinction affects such serious issues as deportation and food stamp allotment.
Suggest a new link by writing j.christo@neu.edu.
